abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Artículo

27 jul 2026

Autor:
Mayu Saini, Sourcing Journal

Asia: New US forced labour tariffs raise concerns among garment manufacturers

Shutterstock (purchased)

"From Relief to Alarm: Asia’s Exporters Read Between the Lines of New U.S. Tariffs", 27 July 2026

The latest tariffs levied following Section 301 investigations by the United States Trade Representative into forced labor have set off a fresh round of reassessments across Asia’s apparel-producing nations, but exporters say the biggest surprise is not the tariff rates themselves: it is the new competitive map emerging underneath them…

Under the new duties, 42 countries face a tariff of 12.5 percent, while 18 countries — including Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Malaysia, India, Indonesia, Pakistan and Cambodia — have been placed in a lower 10 percent category.

Countries including China, Vietnam, Japan, Thailand, South Korea, the Philippines and Singapore face the higher 12.5 percent rate…

…attention quickly shifted away from the tariff percentages toward the incentives embedded in the package. The most significant is a new “textile mechanism” allowing qualifying textile and apparel exports made with U.S. inputs, including cotton, to enter the U.S. free from the Section 301 tariffs.

That provision is expected to benefit Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia and Malaysia, potentially giving them a sourcing advantage over competitors such as India, even where headline tariff rates are identical.

Further measures are also expected, including tariffs targeting structural excess capacity, with China and Bangladesh in Washington’s focus.

The result, analysts say, is that sourcing competitiveness will increasingly depend not only on tariff rates but also on where manufacturers obtain their raw materials and how supply chains are reorganized…

Mustafizur Rahman, distinguished fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue, said higher prices would inevitably weaken purchasing demand in the U.S., creating additional pressure on exporters already operating in a slowing market…

Línea del tiempo