abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Procès bâillon (SLAPP)

21 Jul 2021

SAVE Rivers

Statut : ONGOING

Date de dépôt de la plainte
21 Jul 2021
Exactitude de la date
Tout est correct
Civil
Non applicable
SAVE Rivers
Groupe de défense de l'environnement
Procès : SLAPP
Demandes en justice: Diffamation
Montant des dommages: $1.182.785
Montant des dommages (monnaie locale): RM5 million
Procès intenté par: Company
Cible: Groupe, Organisation ou Institution
Lieu de dépôt de la plainte: Malaisie
Lieu de l'incident: Malaisie
Samling Malaisie Exploitation forestière et bois d'œuvre Réponse de l'entreprise

Sources

On 21 June 2021, the logging company Samling Plywood filed a defamation lawsuit against SAVE Rivers and its directors for publishing alleged defamatory statements. The company seeks an apology, an injunction stopping SAVE Rivers from reporting community claims, and RM5 million in damages (around 1 million USD). SAVE Rivers has alleged that the concession issued in favor of Samling was allegedly done without compliance with due process and thereby allegedly in violation of the rights of the indigenous communities. Several communities also alleged that they were not consulted about the concessions before their approval. A coalition of local and international organizations, including the Bruno Manser Fund and The Borneo Project, have called on Samling to drop the lawsuit. We invited the company to respond; it did. A rejoinder from The Borneo Project is available here.