abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

이 내용은 다음 언어로도 제공됩니다: English, 简体中文, 繁體中文

기사

9 10월 2023

저자:
AusNCP

Australian National Contact Point (AusNCP) makes no determination that Chinese-owned PanAust has acted inconsistently with the OECD Guideline in Final Statement

"Final Statement", 3 October 2023

[...]

CONCLUSION

The notifiers’ fundamental complaint is that acts and omissions in the enterprise’s community engagement has breached the OECD Guidelines. This examination makes no determination that the enterprise has acted inconsistently with the OECD Guidelines. From the information provided, it appears extensive consultation and engagement is underway with communities in Papua New Guinea. This is being conducted by the enterprise and Papua New Guinea Government agencies, and those agencies are currently considering the enterprise’s proposals and whether they should proceed. That process is subject to Papua New Guinea law and court oversight. Many factual matters, which are contested by the parties in this AusNCP complaint, will be determined by the Papua New Guinea processes. Relevant community agreements, consistent with the OECD Guidelines, could eventuate through those processes. It would, therefore, be inappropriate for the AusNCP to make a statement, now, that those agreements cannot occur in the future.

[...]

That no determination is made here, with deference to the ongoing process in Papua New Guinea, may raise the question: why was that not decided at initial assessment? NCP initial assessments are not meant to involve detailed investigation and determinations. Instead, the objective of an initial assessment is to determine whether the issues raised merit further examination, and it can assist in identifying issues for framing meditation or good offices. Domestic regulatory procedures are a relevant consideration which NCPs consider during initial assessments (e.g. applicable law, parallel proceedings, and whether good offices would further the OECD Guidelines). Current or completed domestic procedures, involving the parties in an NCP complaint, may encompass all that could validly be within an OECD Guidelines specific instance/complaint. That can lead to a complaint being refused at initial assessment. However, where the domestic procedures do not clearly ‘cover the field’, this leaves issues appropriate for good offices. That was the case here, as explained in the AusNCP’s initial assessment. When the enterprise refused to participate in good offices here, the matter proceeded to examination.

[...]

타임라인

개인정보

이 웹사이트는 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다. 아래에서 개인정보보호 옵션을 설정할 수 있습니다. 변경 사항은 즉시 적용됩니다.

웹 저장소 사용에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음을 참조하세요 데이터 사용 및 쿠키 정책

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

분석 쿠키

ON
OFF

귀하가 우리 웹사이트를 방문하면 Google Analytics를 사용하여 귀하의 방문 정보를 수집합니다. 이 쿠키를 수락하면 저희가 귀하의 방문에 대한 자세한 내용을 이해하고, 정보 표시 방법을 개선할 수 있습니다. 모든 분석 정보는 익명이 보장되며 귀하를 식별하는데 사용하지 않습니다. Google은 모든 브라우저에 대해 Google Analytics 선택 해제 추가 기능을 제공합니다.

프로모션 쿠키

ON
OFF

우리는 소셜미디어와 검색 엔진을 포함한 제3자 플랫폼을 통해 기업과 인권에 대한 뉴스와 업데이트를 제공합니다. 이 쿠키는 이러한 프로모션의 성과를 이해하는데 도움이 됩니다.

이 사이트에 대한 개인정보 공개 범위 선택

이 사이트는 필요한 핵심 기능 이상으로 귀하의 경험을 향상시키기 위해 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다.