abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

์ด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ English๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์‚ฌ

2016๋…„ 1์›” 11์ผ

์ €์ž:
Sophia Cope, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Doe, et al. v. Cisco Systems: Brief of amici curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, Article 19 and Privacy International in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants & reversal

This is the second Alien Tort Statute (โ€œATSโ€) case in which plaintiffs allege that the technology giant Cisco specially built surveillance, censorship, and other repressive products for the Chinese government that targeted disfavored groups โ€” here, a religious minority called the Falun Gong, and in the other, prominent democracy activists โ€” who were then subjected to torture and other recognized human rights abusesโ€ฆIn the digital age, repressive governments do not act alone to violate human rights. They have accomplices โ€” including American technology companies like Cisco, as alleged by Plaintiffs โ€” with the sophistication and technical know-how that those repressive governments lack. If aiding and abetting liability under the Alien Tort Statute is to mean anything, it must apply to cases like thisโ€ฆ

๋‹ค์Œ ํƒ€์ž„๋ผ์ธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€

NGO asks US appeals court to revive case against Cisco over alleged complicity in Chinese Govt. abuse

Cisco Systems lawsuits (re China)