abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

هذه الصفحة غير متوفرة باللغة العربية وهي معروضة باللغة English

المحتوى متاح أيضًا باللغات التالية: English, 简体中文

القصة

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

ردود الشركة

Kapan mining and processing company عرض الرد
Zijin Mining عرض الرد
Norilsk Nickel عرض الرد
Perzhanska Ore Company عرض الرد
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC عرض الرد
GeoProMining

لا جواب

Yugo Metals

لا جواب

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

لا جواب

Georgian Manganese LLC عرض الرد
Kazakhmys

لا جواب

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

لا جواب

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

لا جواب

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

لا جواب

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

لا جواب

Bapy Mining LLP

لا جواب

Glencore عرض الرد
Kazchrome

لا جواب

Mendia Resources LLC

لا جواب

KAZ Minerals PLC

لا جواب

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

لا جواب

Kumtor Gold Company

لا جواب

Minstroy Holding JSC

لا جواب

JSC Russian Copper Company

لا جواب

Evraz

لا جواب

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

لا جواب

Highland Gold

لا جواب

Rosatom

لا جواب

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

لا جواب

United Company RUSAL

لا جواب

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

لا جواب

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

لا جواب

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

لا جواب

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) عرض الرد

الجدول الزمني