abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

內容有以下的語言版本: English, 简体中文

故事

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

企業回應

Kapan mining and processing company 瀏覽回應
Zijin Mining 瀏覽回應
Norilsk Nickel 瀏覽回應
Perzhanska Ore Company 瀏覽回應
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC 瀏覽回應
GeoProMining

沒有回應

Yugo Metals

沒有回應

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

沒有回應

Georgian Manganese LLC 瀏覽回應
Kazakhmys

沒有回應

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

沒有回應

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

沒有回應

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

沒有回應

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

沒有回應

Bapy Mining LLP

沒有回應

Glencore 瀏覽回應
Kazchrome

沒有回應

Mendia Resources LLC

沒有回應

KAZ Minerals PLC

沒有回應

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

沒有回應

Kumtor Gold Company

沒有回應

Minstroy Holding JSC

沒有回應

JSC Russian Copper Company

沒有回應

Evraz

沒有回應

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

沒有回應

Highland Gold

沒有回應

Rosatom

沒有回應

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

沒有回應

United Company RUSAL

沒有回應

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

沒有回應

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

沒有回應

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

沒有回應

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) 瀏覽回應

時間線