abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Материал доступен на следующих языках: English, 简体中文

История

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

Ответы компании

Kapan mining and processing company Смотреть ответ
Perzhanska Ore Company Смотреть ответ
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC Смотреть ответ
GeoProMining

Нет ответа

Yugo Metals

Нет ответа

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

Нет ответа

Georgian Manganese LLC Смотреть ответ
Kazakhmys

Нет ответа

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

Нет ответа

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

Нет ответа

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

Нет ответа

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

Нет ответа

Bapy Mining LLP

Нет ответа

Kazchrome

Нет ответа

Mendia Resources LLC

Нет ответа

KAZ Minerals PLC

Нет ответа

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

Нет ответа

Kumtor Gold Company

Нет ответа

Minstroy Holding JSC

Нет ответа

JSC Russian Copper Company

Нет ответа

Evraz

Нет ответа

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

Нет ответа

Highland Gold

Нет ответа

Rosatom

Нет ответа

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

Нет ответа

United Company RUSAL

Нет ответа

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

Нет ответа

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

Нет ответа

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

Нет ответа

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) Смотреть ответ

Хронология