abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Le contenu est également disponible dans les langues suivantes: English, 简体中文

Affaire

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

Réponses de l'entreprise

Kapan mining and processing company Voir la réponse
Zijin Mining Voir la réponse
Norilsk Nickel Voir la réponse
Perzhanska Ore Company Voir la réponse
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC Voir la réponse
GeoProMining

Aucune réponse

Yugo Metals

Aucune réponse

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

Aucune réponse

Georgian Manganese LLC Voir la réponse
Kazakhmys

Aucune réponse

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

Aucune réponse

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

Aucune réponse

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

Aucune réponse

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

Aucune réponse

Bapy Mining LLP

Aucune réponse

Glencore Voir la réponse
Kazchrome

Aucune réponse

Mendia Resources LLC

Aucune réponse

KAZ Minerals PLC

Aucune réponse

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

Aucune réponse

Kumtor Gold Company

Aucune réponse

Minstroy Holding JSC

Aucune réponse

JSC Russian Copper Company

Aucune réponse

Evraz

Aucune réponse

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

Aucune réponse

Highland Gold

Aucune réponse

Rosatom

Aucune réponse

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

Aucune réponse

United Company RUSAL

Aucune réponse

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

Aucune réponse

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

Aucune réponse

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

Aucune réponse

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) Voir la réponse

Chronologie