abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

10 Jan 2008

45 defendant companies in apartheid reparations lawsuit

[PDF] American Isuzu Motors Inc. et al. v. Ntsebeza et al. - Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

[Petition filed by the defendant companies in the South African apartheid reparations lawsuit asking the US Supreme Court to hear their appeal of a lower court's ruling allowing the lawsuit to proceed. Defendant companies are: 3M, Anglo American, BP, Bank of America, Barclays, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Caltex, Chevron, Citigroup, Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse, Crédit Lyonnais (part of Crédit Agricole), DaimlerChrysler [now Daimler], De Beers, Deutsche Bank, Dow Chemical, Dresdner Bank (part of Allianz), DuPont, ExxonMobil, Fluor, Ford, Fujitsu, General Electric, General Motors, HP (Hewlett-Packard), Holcim, Honeywell, IBM, Isuzu, JPMorgan Chase, NatWest (part of Royal Bank of Scotland), Nestlé, Novartis, Rheinmetall, Rio Tinto, Schindler, Shell, Standard Chartered, Total, UBS, Unisys, Volkswagen, Xerox]

Part of the following timelines

Companies sued in US for apartheid reparations appeal adverse ruling to US Supreme Court

Apartheid reparations lawsuits (re So. Africa)