abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송

2009년 7월 1일

Abbott Laboratories lawsuit (re Brazil patent law & access to medicines)

상태: ONGOING

소송을 제기한 날짜
2009년 7월 1일
날짜 정확도
연도 및 달 일치
알 수 없음
Company
제소 위치: 브라질
사건 위치: 브라질
소송 유형: 국내

기업 페이지

Abbott Laboratories 미국 제약회사

출처

Snapshot: Cristàlia, a Brazilian pharmaceutical company that produces a generic version of lop/r, a drug used in the treatment of HIV, brought a lawsuit against Abbott Laboratories seeking to annul its patent on lopinavir. In 2012, a Brazilian court granted Cristália’s request to annul Abbott’s patent on the grounds that the ‘pipeline’ process by which the patent was granted was unconstitutional.

Factual Background

Abbott Laboratories holds the patent for lopinavir (marketed under the brand name ‘Kaletra’), an important drug used in the treatment of HIV.  Brazilian NGOs have criticised this patent because its existence meant the Brazilian Government could only purchase Abbott’s patented, more expensive version of lop/r for use in its public HIV/AIDS treatment programme.

Legal Argument

In July 2009, Cristália, a Brazilian pharmaceutical company that produces a generic version of lop/r, brought a lawsuit against Abbott Laboratories seeking to annul its patent on lopinavir.  Cristália argued that the patent was granted under the “pipeline mechanism”, which allowed revalidation of patents granted in other countries (in this case the US) while Brazil’s patent legislation was being amended.  This mechanism facilitated the extension of pharmaceutical patent monopolies already obtained outside Brazil without having to go through that country’s patent application process. Cristália also claimed that the World Health Organization (WHO) had validated the quality of the generic version and that the generic version facilitates access to HIV treatment due to its lower price.  

Legal Proceedings

On 7 March 2012, the Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro granted Cristália’s request to annul Abbott’s patent on the grounds that the pipeline process was unconstitutional.  This decision thus allows other companies to manufacture a generic lop/r combination, such as the drug produced by Cristália, which costs 47% less than Abbott’s drug.

Latest Legal News

Abbott filed an appeal and requested an injunction to prevent the enforcement of the court’s ruling.  On 23 March 2012, the Federal Regional Court of the second circuit of Rio rejected Abbott’s request for an injunction.  The appeal is pending before the Federal Regional Court.  If the annullment ruling is upheld, other patents granted to drugs through the pipeline process may also be invalidated.

News Items


Documents from NGOs

Legal/Court Documents