abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송

Imperial County and Controlled Thermal Resources lawsuit (re lithium mine, USA)

상태: ONGOING

소송을 제기한 날짜
2024년 3월 1일
날짜 정확도
연도 일치
적용 불가
Human Rights Defender, NGO
제소 위치: 미국
사건 위치: 미국
소송 유형: 국내

기업 페이지

Controlled Thermal Resources 미국 천연 자원: 일반, 채굴

Against other:

Government

출처

Snapshot: In 2024, advocacy groups Comite Civico del Valle and Earthworks filed a lawsuit to stop Controlled Thermal Resources (CTR), an Australian company, from extracting lithium from the Salton Sea in California, USA. In the lawsuit against the County of Imperial and the company, the plaintiffs allege that the environmental review approved by the County for the Hell’s Kitchen Lithium and Power project, which began construction in January 2024, violates the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The lawsuit claims that the County's environmental review inadequately addresses water usage, potential waste generation, and failed to consult with local Indigenous tribes about mitigation measures.

On 9 January 2025, an Imperial County Superior Court Judge, in a tentative decision, ruled in favour of Controlled Thermal Resources, affirming that the company had met the necessary environmental requirements under CEQA. This decision allows the Hell’s Kitchen project to proceed.

In March 2025, Comite Civico del Valle and Earthworks appealed the dismissal. In their opening brief filed before the Fourth District Court of Appeal in September 2025, they argue that the environmental impact report for the Hell’s Kitchen lithium project overlooks significant risks related to air quality, water consumption, hazardous substances, and tribal cultural resources. The company denounced a “frivolous legal appeal” and issued a press release. On 16 July 2026, California's Fourth District Court of Appeal heard oral arguments.

On 11 August 2026, California's Fourth District Court of Appeal partially reversed the ruling upholding Imperial County’s approval of the Hell’s Kitchen geothermal lithium project. It found that the county’s environmental impact report did not sufficiently address the project’s long-term water supply, potential water shortages and related air-quality impacts. However, it ruled that Indigenous Peoples had been adequately consulted on the project's impacts.

The case is ongoing.

타임라인