abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

기사

2011년 1월 20일

저자:
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

[PDF] Response to Financial Times article and Professor Ruggie's response letter

모든 태그 보기

Sir, The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is surprised by your interpretation of the NGOs' joint statement co-signed by FIDH on the draft Guiding Principles as well as Professor Ruggie's response to your article. While you do point out some of the critical areas FIDH considers should be addressed by Professor Ruggie in the draft Guiding Principles under consultation, the intention that is lent to our statement has been distorted.

다음 타임라인의 일부

NGOs criticise UN Special Representative Ruggie's draft Guiding Principles on business & human rights

Critiques of Guiding Principles by Amnesty Intl., Human Rights Watch, FIDH, others - debate with Ruggie